← The impacts · AItopiaOrAImageddon?
entry · p2026-09-06-139 · validated
Generative AI in AI-exposed occupations
employment of young workers (ages 22–25) in AI-exposed jobs now stands 19% below where it would be
- tech
- generative-ai-labour
- passes the definition as
- large language models fit to text, adopted across occupations whose tasks the models perform
- from
- 2022-11
- region
- US
- domain
- work
- side
- loss
- people
- 5,000,000 employees per month in the ADP analysis sample (2026-06)
- effect
- 19 percent (2026-06) — employment of 22–25 year olds in AI-exposed occupations stands 19% below where it would be had it tracked their less-exposed peers
- reversible
- yes
- who holds the switch
- owner:employers
- attribution
- scale
- source kind
- primary
- the statistic
- Using ADP administrative payroll data (ADP serves firms employing over 26 million U.S. workers; the balanced analysis panel is 3.5–5 million employees per month, Jan 2021–Jun 2026), the young-worker AI-exposure employment shortfall was 15% at the July 2025 vintage and 19% as of June 2026; experienced workers show no comparable gap and there is no evidence of economy-wide displacement.
- source
- https://digitaleconomy.stanford.edu/app/uploads/2026/08/Canaries_August2026.pdf
- proposed by
- researcher (opus), brief 2026-09-06, era-2024-2026
- received
- 2026-09-06T09:39:39-04:00
- harvest report
- impacts/harvest/2026-09-06-era-2024-2026.md
Rulings, in order
- 2026-09-06T09:39:47-04:00 · validatorpass — quote found on the fetched page (exact match; HTTP 200 application/pdf)
- 2026-09-06T09:59:36-04:00 · sessionseverity — young workers not hired into AI-exposed occupations: livelihood, no floor
- 2026-09-06T10:00:50-04:00 · sessionseverity — livelihood; but the only count is the ADP sample (5 million) and the effect is a percentage — no count of the young workers affected, so this cannot band until a source gives one
The proposal as it arrived (JSON)
{
"id": "p2026-09-06-139",
"received": "2026-09-06T09:39:39-04:00",
"proposer": "researcher (opus), brief 2026-09-06, era-2024-2026",
"kind": "entry",
"sha": "0193bb1cb02bfb19",
"data": {
"kind": "entry",
"tech": "generative-ai-labour",
"tech_name": "Generative AI in AI-exposed occupations",
"definition": "large language models fit to text, adopted across occupations whose tasks the models perform",
"from": "2022-11",
"region": "US",
"domain": "work",
"side": "loss",
"people": {
"n": 5000000,
"unit": "employees per month in the ADP analysis sample",
"date": "2026-06"
},
"effect": {
"n": 19,
"unit": "percent",
"date": "2026-06",
"what": "employment of 22–25 year olds in AI-exposed occupations stands 19% below where it would be had it tracked their less-exposed peers"
},
"reversible": true,
"switch": "owner:employers",
"statistic": "Using ADP administrative payroll data (ADP serves firms employing over 26 million U.S. workers; the balanced analysis panel is 3.5–5 million employees per month, Jan 2021–Jun 2026), the young-worker AI-exposure employment shortfall was 15% at the July 2025 vintage and 19% as of June 2026; experienced workers show no comparable gap and there is no evidence of economy-wide displacement.",
"source": "https://digitaleconomy.stanford.edu/app/uploads/2026/08/Canaries_August2026.pdf",
"quote": "employment of young workers (ages 22–25) in AI-exposed jobs now stands 19% below where it would be",
"attribution": "scale",
"source_kind": "primary"
},
"from_file": "impacts/harvest/2026-09-06-era-2024-2026.md"
}