← The impacts · AItopiaOrAImageddon?

candidate · p2026-09-06-310 · reject-definition

Android Earthquake Alerts System

set aside as
DEFINITION REJECTS
the researcher's note
Android Earthquake Alerts System. Provisional reject, and I would like it revisited. The Science paper (Allen et al., 2025, doi 10.1126/science.ads4779) says only "smartphone-based earthquake detection algorithms"; Google's own blog describes the accelerometer trigger and the server-side aggregation without naming anything fit to data. Only secondary write-ups call it machine learning. Under "never by suspicion" that is a reject; a line in the paper's methods naming a trained detector or a fitted magnitude estimator would make this one of the largest severe-benefit rows available anywhere.
proposed by
researcher (opus), brief 2026-09-06, severe-benefits
received
2026-09-06T17:40:15-04:00
harvest report
impacts/harvest/2026-09-06-severe-benefits.md

Rulings, in order

  1. 2026-09-06T17:40:15-04:00 · researcherreject-definition — Android Earthquake Alerts System. Provisional reject, and I would like it revisited. The Science paper (Allen et al., 2025, doi 10.1126/science.ads4779) says only "smartphone-based earthquake detection algorithms"; Google's own blog describes the accelerometer trigger and the server-side aggregation without naming anything fit to data. Only secondary write-ups call it machine learning. Under "never by suspicion" that is a reject; a line in the paper's methods naming a trained detector or a fitted magnitude estimator would make this one of the largest severe-benefit rows available anywhere.
The proposal as it arrived (JSON)
{
 "id": "p2026-09-06-310",
 "received": "2026-09-06T17:40:15-04:00",
 "proposer": "researcher (opus), brief 2026-09-06, severe-benefits",
 "kind": "candidate",
 "sha": "bc7d208ec78031cf",
 "data": {
  "name": "Android Earthquake Alerts System",
  "note": "Android Earthquake Alerts System. Provisional reject, and I would like it revisited. The Science paper (Allen et al., 2025, doi 10.1126/science.ads4779) says only \"smartphone-based earthquake detection algorithms\"; Google's own blog describes the accelerometer trigger and the server-side aggregation without naming anything fit to data. Only secondary write-ups call it machine learning. Under \"never by suspicion\" that is a reject; a line in the paper's methods naming a trained detector or a fitted magnitude estimator would make this one of the largest severe-benefit rows available anywhere.",
  "list": "DEFINITION REJECTS"
 },
 "from_file": "impacts/harvest/2026-09-06-severe-benefits.md"
}