← The impacts · AItopiaOrAImageddon?
candidate · p2026-09-07-070 · exclude-attribution
Acemoglu & Restrepo, "Robots and Jobs" (JPE 128(6), 2020, pp
- set aside as
- EXCLUDED BY ATTRIBUTION
- the researcher's note
- Acemoglu & Restrepo, "Robots and Jobs" (JPE 128(6), 2020, pp. 2188–2244). One more robot per thousand workers reduces the employment-to-population ratio by about 0.2 percentage points and wages by about 0.42%, across US commuting zones. The robot stock is the IFR's industrial-robot count — hand-programmed controllers, the owner's own opening example. This is the single most important exclusion in the cluster: it is the best-measured labour effect of factory automation in existence, and no source ties it to a system whose decision procedure was fit to data. The owner's "robots in factories, −1: jobs displaced against goods made cheaper" is, on the definition as written, not an AI entry at all.
- proposed by
- researcher (opus), brief 2026-09-06 second harvest, robots-gig-work
- received
- 2026-09-06T13:34:02-04:00
- harvest report
- impacts/harvest/2026-09-07-robots-gig-work.md
Rulings, in order
- 2026-09-06T13:34:02-04:00 · researcherexclude-attribution — Acemoglu & Restrepo, "Robots and Jobs" (JPE 128(6), 2020, pp. 2188–2244). One more robot per thousand workers reduces the employment-to-population ratio by about 0.2 percentage points and wages by about 0.42%, across US commuting zones. The robot stock is the IFR's industrial-robot count — hand-programmed controllers, the owner's own opening example. This is the single most important exclusion in the cluster: it is the best-measured labour effect of factory automation in existence, and no source ties it to a system whose decision procedure was fit to data. The owner's "robots in factories, −1: jobs displaced against goods made cheaper" is, on the definition as written, not an AI entry at all.
The proposal as it arrived (JSON)
{
"id": "p2026-09-07-070",
"received": "2026-09-06T13:34:02-04:00",
"proposer": "researcher (opus), brief 2026-09-06 second harvest, robots-gig-work",
"kind": "candidate",
"sha": "40a4ea913dff2af5",
"data": {
"name": "Acemoglu & Restrepo, \"Robots and Jobs\" (JPE 128(6), 2020, pp",
"note": "Acemoglu & Restrepo, \"Robots and Jobs\" (JPE 128(6), 2020, pp. 2188–2244). One more robot per thousand workers reduces the employment-to-population ratio by about 0.2 percentage points and wages by about 0.42%, across US commuting zones. The robot stock is the IFR's industrial-robot count — hand-programmed controllers, the owner's own opening example. This is the single most important exclusion in the cluster: it is the best-measured labour effect of factory automation in existence, and no source ties it to a system whose decision procedure was fit to data. The owner's \"robots in factories, −1: jobs displaced against goods made cheaper\" is, on the definition as written, not an AI entry at all.",
"list": "EXCLUDED BY ATTRIBUTION"
},
"from_file": "impacts/harvest/2026-09-07-robots-gig-work.md"
}